MEGAFONEFan Voice, Amplified
B
Barrow·17 Apr 2026
Building support

Who is running our club — and what are they actually trying to achieve?

Campaign by Cary Clue

Being a Chelsea supporter is not a lifestyle choice. It is not a subscription you cancel when results go bad. It is something that gets into your blood — passed down from your dad, your grandad, your older brother, your mates from school. It is the scarf you wore as a kid at Stamford Bridge in the freezing cold, standing next to someone you loved, watching eleven men in blue and feeling like nothing else in the world mattered. It is the badge on the shirt your child now wears. It is the tattoo you cannot explain to people who don't understand football, and don't need to explain to people who do. Chelsea Football Club is not a brand to us. It is not an asset class. It is not a portfolio company. It is a living, breathing part of who we are — woven into our identities, our families, our friendships and our memories in ways that no boardroom decision can fully comprehend, and no balance sheet can ever capture. We turn up in the rain. We travel to away grounds on cold Tuesday nights. We watch from the other side of the world in time zones that make no sense. We buy the shirts, the scarves, the programmes. We purchase from the sponsors. We subscribe to the channels. We fill Stamford Bridge every single home game regardless of whether the team is competing for a title or clinging on to a mid-table position. We have always been there. We will always be there. And that is precisely why we are here. In May 2022, Chelsea Football Club was purchased by a consortium led by Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital. Since that day, the club has spent over £1.3 billion on players. We have had five permanent managers in under four years. We have recorded over £900 million in operating losses. We have reported a record Premier League pre-tax loss of £262.4 million for 2024/25. And through all of it, we have had no meaningful explanation from our owners about where this is all going — or what success actually looks like to the people now running our club. We understand that private equity exists for a specific purpose: to invest capital, grow the value of an asset, and return a profit to its investors within a defined timeframe. That is not a criticism. That is simply what private equity is. But Chelsea Football Club has existed for over 120 years. The supporters who have loved it across those generations did not do so to provide a return on investment. They did it because this club is part of who they are. We are not the same. We are not cut from the same cloth. And we think it is important — for the first time, honestly and openly — to acknowledge that difference rather than paper over it with carefully managed fan forums and reassuring press releases that answer nothing. We come to this platform in good faith. Not with anger. Not with hostility. But with the deep, genuine belief that the one thing supporters and owners should be able to agree on is this: that Chelsea Football Club should be successful. Successful on the pitch. Successful in the long term. The kind of success that means something to the people who have given this club their hearts across generations. And here is something the owners should understand above all else: that financial success — the kind they rightly care about — flows directly from us. We buy the tickets. We purchase the merchandise. We watch on television. We attract the sponsors. We fill that stadium week after week and make this club worth something commercially. Without the supporters, there is no asset. Without our passion, there is no product. Without us turning up in the rain, none of this has any value at all. So we think that earns us the right to be treated with respect. Not managed. Not placated. Respected — with honest, detailed, specific answers to the questions that matter most to the people who matter most to this club. We are asking these questions because we love Chelsea Football Club. We are asking them here because we have not been able to get answers anywhere else. And we are asking them now because, four years into this ownership, we believe we have waited long enough. These are those questions.

Questions for Barrow

5 questions
  1. 1How does Chelsea FC's board define success for the club — in both the short and long term? Please provide specific, measurable definitions rather than statements of aspiration: what does a successful season look like in terms of league position, cup competitions and European football, and what does long-term success look like over the next five to ten years in terms of the club's standing in English and European football?
  2. 2Clearlake Capital is a private equity firm with legal obligations to return capital to its institutional investors — pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and endowments — within a defined timeframe. Can the ownership group explain, specifically and in plain terms, how those obligations are structured in a way that ensures they do not conflict with what Chelsea supporters want: consistent investment in on-pitch success, long-term squad stability and the club's sustained competitiveness at the highest level? If a conflict between those two interests were to arise, who decides — and how?
  3. 3Since May 2022, the ownership group made several specific public commitments to Chelsea supporters — including long-term investment in the club, redevelopment of Stamford Bridge, and building a squad capable of competing for the game's biggest honours. Can the board provide a specific account of which of these commitments have been delivered, which are in progress with defined timelines, and which have been revised or deferred — and the reasons why in each case?
  4. 4Can the club provide a clear and specific description of how Chelsea FC's board is structured — who sits on it, what their individual roles and responsibilities are, and how decisions are divided between the board, the executive leadership and the head coach? Specifically, which categories of decision require board approval, which sit with the executive, and which are delegated to the head coach and sporting directors?
  5. 5The ownership group — Clearlake Capital and Todd Boehly — are investors in Chelsea Football Club. Can they explain, in plain terms, how they define success in their capacity as investors — and specifically, how that definition differs from, or aligns with, the board's definition of success provided in Question 2? Please distinguish clearly between what constitutes a successful outcome financially for the ownership group and what constitutes a successful outcome for Chelsea Football Club on the pitch.

Supporters

2

5 questions

Notification target2 / 50,000

49,998 more to notify the organisation

Creator Updates

1 update

Friday, 17 April 2026

05:08

I have just been contacted by the club and they have told me they will be definitely responding within the next week - so look out for when that happens.

Discussion

2 comments
Sign in and support this campaign to join the discussion.
  • CC
    ClueyCreator1h ago

    Hey get on board everyone

    • CC
      ClueyCreator1h ago

      ok get on board

Campaign Progress

Campaign Launched17 Apr 2026
Building Supporters
Barrow Notified
Awaiting Response
Responded
Resolution
Who is running our club — and what are they actually trying to achieve? — Megafone